Consensual Nonmonogamy: Psychological Well-Being and Relationship Quality Correlates
In plain language, the main point is this: reviewed research generally suggested similar wellbeing and relationship-quality outcomes.
Orgasmaphoria editorial perspective
About this source
This pushes us to evaluate agreements, honesty, care, and power rather than ranking relationship structures. Neither monogamy nor non-monogamy guarantees a good relationship. The key boundary is that it cannot establish diagnosis, individual prediction, universal claims, or advice beyond its stated scope..
Why it matters: This source demonstrates that relationship structure alone does not decide care, communication, or satisfaction. It helps readers judge relationships by consent and behavior instead of treating monogamy as the automatic standard.
Purpose and scope
See source record and full text during editorial review.
Review; no single sample.
Findings or central themes
Reviewed research generally suggested similar wellbeing and relationship-quality outcomes.
Strengths
Directly relevant to the library topic and retained with a stable source citation and explicit evidence label.
Limitations
Narrative review with a limited historical evidence base.
Do not use this source to claim: Do not use this source for diagnosis, individual prediction, universal claims, or advice beyond its stated scope.
Citation and access
Alicia N. Rubel, Anthony F. Bogaert (2015). Consensual Nonmonogamy: Psychological Well-Being and Relationship Quality Correlates. The Journal of Sex Research DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2014.942722
Public abstract
External sources may change, move, require payment, or have different privacy practices. This library record is educational context, not medical, legal, or emergency advice.
