Systematic review / meta-analysis
Countering the Monogamy-Superiority Myth: A Meta-Analysis of the Differences in Relationship Satisfaction and Sexual Satisfaction as a Function of Relationship Orientation
Joel R. Anderson, Jordan D. X. Hinton, Alena Bondarchuk-McLaughlin, Scarlet Rosa, Kian Jin Tan, Lily Moor2025
Across 35 studies, monogamous and consensually non-monogamous participants reported similar satisfaction on average.
Systematic review / meta-analysis
Countering the Monogamy-Superiority Myth: A Meta-Analysis of the Differences in Relationship Satisfaction and Sexual Satisfaction as a Function of Relationship Orientation
Joel R. Anderson, Jordan D. X. Hinton, Alena Bondarchuk-McLaughlin, Scarlet Rosa, Kian Jin Tan, Lily Moor · 2025
Across 35 studies, monogamous and consensually non-monogamous participants reported similar satisfaction on average.
Why it matters
This source demonstrates that relationship structure alone does not decide care, communication, or satisfaction. It helps readers judge relationships by consent and behavior instead of treating monogamy as the automatic standard.
Our perspective
This synthesis directly challenges the assumption that one relationship structure automatically produces better relationships or sex. Its strongest use is comparative and modest: average satisfaction was similar, while individual agreements, communication, fit, and conduct still matter.
- Publisher
- The Journal of Sex Research
- Access
- Public abstract