Consensual Non-Monogamy—Considering Sexual Minorities and Moving Away from a Dyadic Conceptualization
In plain language, the main point is this: inventory identifies focus on sexual minorities and moving beyond dyadic conceptualizations.
Orgasmaphoria editorial perspective
About this source
This pushes us to evaluate agreements, honesty, care, and power rather than ranking relationship structures. Neither monogamy nor non-monogamy guarantees a good relationship. The key boundary is that it cannot establish diagnosis, individual prediction, universal claims, or advice beyond its stated scope..
Why it matters: This source demonstrates that relationship structure alone does not decide care, communication, or satisfaction. It helps readers judge relationships by consent and behavior instead of treating monogamy as the automatic standard.
Purpose and scope
See source record and full text during editorial review.
To be verified.
Findings or central themes
Inventory identifies focus on sexual minorities and moving beyond dyadic conceptualizations.
Strengths
Directly relevant to the library topic and retained with a stable source citation and explicit evidence label.
Limitations
Metadata and full text require authoritative verification.
Do not use this source to claim: Do not use this source for diagnosis, individual prediction, universal claims, or advice beyond its stated scope.
Citation and access
Dora Morar-Bolba, Rainer Banse, Terri D. Conley (2025). Consensual Non-Monogamy—Considering Sexual Minorities and Moving Away from a Dyadic Conceptualization. International Journal of Sexual Health DOI: 10.1080/19317611.2025.2576764
Open access
External sources may change, move, require payment, or have different privacy practices. This library record is educational context, not medical, legal, or emergency advice.
